[
  {
    "id": "R01",
    "title": "Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap",
    "authors": "Khalsa SS et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R02",
    "title": "The Emerging Science of Interoception: Sensing, Integrating, Interpreting, and Regulating Signals within the Self",
    "authors": "Chen WG et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R03",
    "title": "How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body",
    "authors": "Craig AD",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R04",
    "title": "Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness",
    "authors": "Critchley HD, Wiens S, Rotshtein P, Ohman A, Dolan RJ",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R05",
    "title": "Interoception and emotion",
    "authors": "Critchley HD, Garfinkel SN",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C05",
      "BBT-C19"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "No single laboratory task establishes a person’s global interoceptive ability, and self-report should not be treated as an objective physiological measure.",
      "The lecture does not endorse a unique peripheral signature for each emotion or claim that cognition merely labels pre-existing bodily states."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R06",
    "title": "Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness",
    "authors": "Garfinkel SN et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C05"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "No single laboratory task establishes a person’s global interoceptive ability, and self-report should not be treated as an objective physiological measure."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R07",
    "title": "Towards a comprehensive assessment of interoception in a multi-dimensional framework",
    "authors": "Suksasilp C, Garfinkel SN",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C05",
      "BBT-C06"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "No single laboratory task establishes a person’s global interoceptive ability, and self-report should not be treated as an objective physiological measure.",
      "Evidence for cross-modal independence is growing but task reliability remains an active methodological problem."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R08",
    "title": "The new measures of interoceptive accuracy: a systematic review and assessment",
    "authors": "Desmedt O, Luminet O, Walentynowicz M, Corneille O",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C05",
      "BBT-C06"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "No single laboratory task establishes a person’s global interoceptive ability, and self-report should not be treated as an objective physiological measure.",
      "Evidence for cross-modal independence is growing but task reliability remains an active methodological problem."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R09",
    "title": "The Coding Logic of Interoception",
    "authors": "Wang R, Chang RB",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C06",
      "BBT-C07",
      "BBT-C44"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "Evidence for cross-modal independence is growing but task reliability remains an active methodological problem.",
      "Vagal anatomy does not justify using vagal tone as a synonym for safety, regulation, resilience or social engagement.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R10",
    "title": "Brain-body physiology: local, reflex, and central communication",
    "authors": "Sammons M et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C07",
      "BBT-C08",
      "BBT-C44"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "Vagal anatomy does not justify using vagal tone as a synonym for safety, regulation, resilience or social engagement.",
      "Regional activation is not a diagnostic fingerprint. Insula or cingulate involvement does not establish a unique psychological process.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R11",
    "title": "The Organization of the Primate Insular Cortex",
    "authors": "Evrard HC",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C08",
      "BBT-C44"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Regional activation is not a diagnostic fingerprint. Insula or cingulate involvement does not establish a unique psychological process.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R12",
    "title": "Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function",
    "authors": "Menon V, Uddin LQ",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C08",
      "BBT-C19",
      "BBT-C44"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Regional activation is not a diagnostic fingerprint. Insula or cingulate involvement does not establish a unique psychological process.",
      "The lecture does not endorse a unique peripheral signature for each emotion or claim that cognition merely labels pre-existing bodily states.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R13",
    "title": "Interoceptive rhythms in the brain",
    "authors": "Engelen T, Solca M, Tallon-Baudry C",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C08",
      "BBT-C09",
      "BBT-C19",
      "BBT-C22",
      "BBT-C24",
      "BBT-C44"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Regional activation is not a diagnostic fingerprint. Insula or cingulate involvement does not establish a unique psychological process.",
      "Cardiac, respiratory and gastric phase effects are real research domains, but effect sizes and generalizability vary across tasks.",
      "The lecture does not endorse a unique peripheral signature for each emotion or claim that cognition merely labels pre-existing bodily states.",
      "Bodily self-consciousness is multisensory; interoception is one contributor among vision, touch, proprioception, vestibular signals, memory and social cognition.",
      "History dependence does not imply permanence. Biological and learned processes operate on multiple reversible and irreversible timescales.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R14",
    "title": "Physiological feelings",
    "authors": "Pace-Schott EF et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C09",
      "BBT-C19",
      "BBT-C22",
      "BBT-C44"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "Cardiac, respiratory and gastric phase effects are real research domains, but effect sizes and generalizability vary across tasks.",
      "The lecture does not endorse a unique peripheral signature for each emotion or claim that cognition merely labels pre-existing bodily states.",
      "Bodily self-consciousness is multisensory; interoception is one contributor among vision, touch, proprioception, vestibular signals, memory and social cognition.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R15",
    "title": "The functional role of cardiac activity in perception and action",
    "authors": "Skora L, Livermore JJA, Roelofs K",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C09",
      "BBT-C22",
      "BBT-C43",
      "BBT-C44"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "Cardiac, respiratory and gastric phase effects are real research domains, but effect sizes and generalizability vary across tasks.",
      "Bodily self-consciousness is multisensory; interoception is one contributor among vision, touch, proprioception, vestibular signals, memory and social cognition.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R16",
    "title": "Brain-heart interactions: physiology and clinical implications",
    "authors": "Silvani A et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C09",
      "BBT-C43",
      "BBT-C44"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "Cardiac, respiratory and gastric phase effects are real research domains, but effect sizes and generalizability vary across tasks.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R17",
    "title": "Neural mechanisms of respiratory interoception",
    "authors": "Chan PYS, Lee LY, Davenport PW",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C08",
      "BBT-C09",
      "BBT-C43",
      "BBT-C44"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "Regional activation is not a diagnostic fingerprint. Insula or cingulate involvement does not establish a unique psychological process.",
      "Cardiac, respiratory and gastric phase effects are real research domains, but effect sizes and generalizability vary across tasks.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R18",
    "title": "Cardiogenic control of affective behavioural state",
    "authors": "Hsueh B et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C01",
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C09",
      "BBT-C43",
      "BBT-C44"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Temporal precedence does not prove that bodily change causes a later thought. Reciprocal causation and common causes remain possible.",
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "Cardiac, respiratory and gastric phase effects are real research domains, but effect sizes and generalizability vary across tasks.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R19",
    "title": "Fear balance is maintained by bodily feedback to the insular cortex in mice",
    "authors": "Klein AS et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C04"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R20",
    "title": "Neural origins of human sickness in interoceptive responses to inflammation",
    "authors": "Harrison NA et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C04",
      "BBT-C38"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The boundary of interoception remains debated; some classifications treat pain, temperature or proprioception differently.",
      "Immune mechanisms explain only subsets of psychiatric symptoms; biomarkers such as CRP are nonspecific and should not be used as stand-alone psychiatric explanations."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R21",
    "title": "Allostasis: a model of predictive regulation",
    "authors": "Sterling P",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C02",
      "BBT-C10",
      "BBT-C43"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Allostasis is a broad regulatory framework, not a claim that every bodily change is centrally predicted or consciously represented.",
      "Predictive regulation is a systems-level interpretation; not every anticipatory response requires a detailed cortical generative model.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R22",
    "title": "Stress and the individual: mechanisms leading to disease",
    "authors": "McEwen BS, Stellar E",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C02",
      "BBT-C10",
      "BBT-C11",
      "BBT-C25",
      "BBT-C43"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Allostasis is a broad regulatory framework, not a claim that every bodily change is centrally predicted or consciously represented.",
      "Predictive regulation is a systems-level interpretation; not every anticipatory response requires a detailed cortical generative model.",
      "Allostatic-load indices vary across studies and should not be treated as a universal clinical score for an individual.",
      "No single biomarker defines stress or safety. Cortisol, HRV and inflammatory markers each index limited components of a larger response.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R23",
    "title": "Stress, adaptation, and disease: allostasis and allostatic load",
    "authors": "McEwen BS",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C02",
      "BBT-C10",
      "BBT-C11",
      "BBT-C24",
      "BBT-C25",
      "BBT-C43"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Allostasis is a broad regulatory framework, not a claim that every bodily change is centrally predicted or consciously represented.",
      "Predictive regulation is a systems-level interpretation; not every anticipatory response requires a detailed cortical generative model.",
      "Allostatic-load indices vary across studies and should not be treated as a universal clinical score for an individual.",
      "History dependence does not imply permanence. Biological and learned processes operate on multiple reversible and irreversible timescales.",
      "No single biomarker defines stress or safety. Cortisol, HRV and inflammatory markers each index limited components of a larger response.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R24",
    "title": "Uncertainty and stress: why it causes diseases and how it is mastered by the brain",
    "authors": "Peters A, McEwen BS, Friston K",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C02",
      "BBT-C10",
      "BBT-C11",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C24",
      "BBT-C25",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C43"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Allostasis is a broad regulatory framework, not a claim that every bodily change is centrally predicted or consciously represented.",
      "Predictive regulation is a systems-level interpretation; not every anticipatory response requires a detailed cortical generative model.",
      "Allostatic-load indices vary across studies and should not be treated as a universal clinical score for an individual.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "History dependence does not imply permanence. Biological and learned processes operate on multiple reversible and irreversible timescales.",
      "No single biomarker defines stress or safety. Cortisol, HRV and inflammatory markers each index limited components of a larger response.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R25",
    "title": "Active inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control",
    "authors": "Pezzulo G, Rigoli F, Friston K",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C02",
      "BBT-C10",
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C15",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C23",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Allostasis is a broad regulatory framework, not a claim that every bodily change is centrally predicted or consciously represented.",
      "Predictive regulation is a systems-level interpretation; not every anticipatory response requires a detailed cortical generative model.",
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "Active inference is one computational framework among several. Similar behavioral loops can be modeled using reinforcement learning, control theory or associative learning.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "The control-theoretic language is explanatory; individual agency cannot be inferred from one physiological or computational measure.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R26",
    "title": "Active interoceptive inference and the emotional brain",
    "authors": "Seth AK, Friston KJ",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C14",
      "BBT-C15",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "Precision is a formal parameter whose neurobiological implementation is distributed and task-dependent; it should not be equated with one neurotransmitter or one region.",
      "Active inference is one computational framework among several. Similar behavioral loops can be modeled using reinforcement learning, control theory or associative learning.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R27",
    "title": "Interoceptive predictions in the brain",
    "authors": "Barrett LF, Simmons WK",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C14",
      "BBT-C15",
      "BBT-C19",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "Precision is a formal parameter whose neurobiological implementation is distributed and task-dependent; it should not be equated with one neurotransmitter or one region.",
      "Active inference is one computational framework among several. Similar behavioral loops can be modeled using reinforcement learning, control theory or associative learning.",
      "The lecture does not endorse a unique peripheral signature for each emotion or claim that cognition merely labels pre-existing bodily states.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R28",
    "title": "The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization",
    "authors": "Barrett LF",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C14",
      "BBT-C15",
      "BBT-C19",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "Precision is a formal parameter whose neurobiological implementation is distributed and task-dependent; it should not be equated with one neurotransmitter or one region.",
      "Active inference is one computational framework among several. Similar behavioral loops can be modeled using reinforcement learning, control theory or associative learning.",
      "The lecture does not endorse a unique peripheral signature for each emotion or claim that cognition merely labels pre-existing bodily states.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R29",
    "title": "Interoceptive inference: from computational neuroscience to clinic",
    "authors": "Owens AP, Allen M, Ondobaka S, Friston K",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C14",
      "BBT-C15",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "Precision is a formal parameter whose neurobiological implementation is distributed and task-dependent; it should not be equated with one neurotransmitter or one region.",
      "Active inference is one computational framework among several. Similar behavioral loops can be modeled using reinforcement learning, control theory or associative learning.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R30",
    "title": "An Active Inference Approach to Interoceptive Psychopathology",
    "authors": "Paulus MP, Feinstein JS, Khalsa SS",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C14",
      "BBT-C15",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "Precision is a formal parameter whose neurobiological implementation is distributed and task-dependent; it should not be equated with one neurotransmitter or one region.",
      "Active inference is one computational framework among several. Similar behavioral loops can be modeled using reinforcement learning, control theory or associative learning.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R31",
    "title": "Computational psychosomatics and computational psychiatry: toward a joint framework for differential diagnosis",
    "authors": "Petzschner FH, Weber LAE, Gard T, Stephan KE",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C14",
      "BBT-C15",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "Precision is a formal parameter whose neurobiological implementation is distributed and task-dependent; it should not be equated with one neurotransmitter or one region.",
      "Active inference is one computational framework among several. Similar behavioral loops can be modeled using reinforcement learning, control theory or associative learning.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R32",
    "title": "Allostatic Self-efficacy: a metacognitive theory of dyshomeostasis-induced fatigue and depression",
    "authors": "Stephan KE et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C12",
      "BBT-C14",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C23",
      "BBT-C29",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "The lecture does not infer individual energy metabolism from subjective fatigue, nor does it frame fatigue as a single computational error.",
      "Precision is a formal parameter whose neurobiological implementation is distributed and task-dependent; it should not be equated with one neurotransmitter or one region.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "The control-theoretic language is explanatory; individual agency cannot be inferred from one physiological or computational measure.",
      "The lecture does not claim that depression is caused by low energy, inflammation or interoceptive error; these are heterogeneous contributors and candidate mechanisms.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R33",
    "title": "A Bayesian computational model reveals a failure to adapt interoceptive precision estimates across depression, anxiety, eating, and substance use disorders",
    "authors": "Smith R et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C14",
      "BBT-C16",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Precision is a formal parameter whose neurobiological implementation is distributed and task-dependent; it should not be equated with one neurotransmitter or one region.",
      "The task-based precision parameter is not a general clinical biomarker and should not be generalized to every interoceptive channel.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R34",
    "title": "Transdiagnostic failure to adapt interoceptive precision estimates across affective, substance use, and eating disorders: replication and extension",
    "authors": "Lavalley CA et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C14",
      "BBT-C16",
      "BBT-C18",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Precision is a formal parameter whose neurobiological implementation is distributed and task-dependent; it should not be equated with one neurotransmitter or one region.",
      "The task-based precision parameter is not a general clinical biomarker and should not be generalized to every interoceptive channel.",
      "Evidence that precision change causally mediates clinical recovery is emerging and not yet sufficient for broad treatment claims.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R35",
    "title": "Allostatic interoceptive overload across psychiatric and neurological conditions",
    "authors": "Santamaria-Garcia H et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C02",
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C10",
      "BBT-C11",
      "BBT-C24",
      "BBT-C25",
      "BBT-C29",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Allostasis is a broad regulatory framework, not a claim that every bodily change is centrally predicted or consciously represented.",
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Predictive regulation is a systems-level interpretation; not every anticipatory response requires a detailed cortical generative model.",
      "Allostatic-load indices vary across studies and should not be treated as a universal clinical score for an individual.",
      "History dependence does not imply permanence. Biological and learned processes operate on multiple reversible and irreversible timescales.",
      "No single biomarker defines stress or safety. Cortisol, HRV and inflammatory markers each index limited components of a larger response.",
      "The lecture does not claim that depression is caused by low energy, inflammation or interoceptive error; these are heterogeneous contributors and candidate mechanisms.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R36",
    "title": "In the Body’s Eye: the computational anatomy of interoceptive inference",
    "authors": "Allen M, Levy AR, Parr T, Friston K",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C14",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "Precision is a formal parameter whose neurobiological implementation is distributed and task-dependent; it should not be equated with one neurotransmitter or one region.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R37",
    "title": "Interoception as modeling, allostasis as control",
    "authors": "Sennesh E et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C10",
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C15",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C23",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Predictive regulation is a systems-level interpretation; not every anticipatory response requires a detailed cortical generative model.",
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "Active inference is one computational framework among several. Similar behavioral loops can be modeled using reinforcement learning, control theory or associative learning.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "The control-theoretic language is explanatory; individual agency cannot be inferred from one physiological or computational measure.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R38",
    "title": "Allostasis as a core feature of hierarchical gradients in the human brain",
    "authors": "Katsumi Y et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C08",
      "BBT-C10",
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Regional activation is not a diagnostic fingerprint. Insula or cingulate involvement does not establish a unique psychological process.",
      "Predictive regulation is a systems-level interpretation; not every anticipatory response requires a detailed cortical generative model.",
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R39",
    "title": "Intrinsic timescales and predictive allostatic interoception in brain health and disease",
    "authors": "Ibanez A, Northoff G",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "5. The Predictive Body - The Brain Does Not Wait for the Signal",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C10",
      "BBT-C13",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C24",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Predictive regulation is a systems-level interpretation; not every anticipatory response requires a detailed cortical generative model.",
      "Generative models are explanatory abstractions. The brain is not assumed to store explicit probability tables corresponding to the equations.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "History dependence does not imply permanence. Biological and learned processes operate on multiple reversible and irreversible timescales.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R40",
    "title": "The energetic cost of allostasis and allostatic load",
    "authors": "Bobba-Alves N, Juster RP, Picard M",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C02",
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C10",
      "BBT-C11",
      "BBT-C12",
      "BBT-C21",
      "BBT-C24",
      "BBT-C25",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Allostasis is a broad regulatory framework, not a claim that every bodily change is centrally predicted or consciously represented.",
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Predictive regulation is a systems-level interpretation; not every anticipatory response requires a detailed cortical generative model.",
      "Allostatic-load indices vary across studies and should not be treated as a universal clinical score for an individual.",
      "The lecture does not infer individual energy metabolism from subjective fatigue, nor does it frame fatigue as a single computational error.",
      "The language of reachability is a Flow Hijacked formalization, not a validated clinical metric of emotion.",
      "History dependence does not imply permanence. Biological and learned processes operate on multiple reversible and irreversible timescales.",
      "No single biomarker defines stress or safety. Cortisol, HRV and inflammatory markers each index limited components of a larger response.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R41",
    "title": "Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: a review",
    "authors": "Brewer R, Murphy J, Bird G",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C20",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "Alexithymia is not equivalent to poor interoception, and self-report measures can confound emotional vocabulary with bodily accuracy.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R42",
    "title": "Common threads: altered interoceptive processes across affective and anxiety disorders",
    "authors": "Saltafossi M, Heck D, Kluger DS, Varga S",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "14. Can the Body Learn Again? - Recalibration and Treatment",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C28",
      "BBT-C40",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Bodily arousal is not inherently pathological, and panic cannot be diagnosed from interoceptive performance or autonomic measures.",
      "Exposure should be condition-specific and clinically guided where appropriate; deliberately provoking symptoms is not a universal self-help strategy.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R43",
    "title": "Interoception in anxiety, depression, and psychosis: a review",
    "authors": "Jenkinson PM, Fotopoulou A, Ibanez A, Rossell SL",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C28",
      "BBT-C29",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Bodily arousal is not inherently pathological, and panic cannot be diagnosed from interoceptive performance or autonomic measures.",
      "The lecture does not claim that depression is caused by low energy, inflammation or interoceptive error; these are heterogeneous contributors and candidate mechanisms.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R44",
    "title": "Major depressive disorder is associated with impaired interoceptive accuracy: a systematic review",
    "authors": "Eggart M et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C28",
      "BBT-C29",
      "BBT-C46"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Bodily arousal is not inherently pathological, and panic cannot be diagnosed from interoceptive performance or autonomic measures.",
      "The lecture does not claim that depression is caused by low energy, inflammation or interoceptive error; these are heterogeneous contributors and candidate mechanisms.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R45",
    "title": "Interoceptive Processing in Substance Use Disorders: from neuroanatomy to computational models and predictive coding",
    "authors": "Paulus MP",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C29",
      "BBT-C31",
      "BBT-C32",
      "BBT-C33",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "The lecture does not claim that depression is caused by low energy, inflammation or interoceptive error; these are heterogeneous contributors and candidate mechanisms.",
      "Interoceptive models complement rather than replace reward learning, habit, stress, social context and pharmacology in addiction.",
      "Negative reinforcement is prominent in many addictions but does not describe every stage, substance or person.",
      "Regulatory-repertoire language is a Flow Hijacked construct; it is not a validated addiction outcome scale.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R46",
    "title": "A Systematic Review of Interoception in Substance Use Disorders",
    "authors": "Im JJ et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C29",
      "BBT-C31",
      "BBT-C32",
      "BBT-C33",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "The lecture does not claim that depression is caused by low energy, inflammation or interoceptive error; these are heterogeneous contributors and candidate mechanisms.",
      "Interoceptive models complement rather than replace reward learning, habit, stress, social context and pharmacology in addiction.",
      "Negative reinforcement is prominent in many addictions but does not describe every stage, substance or person.",
      "Regulatory-repertoire language is a Flow Hijacked construct; it is not a validated addiction outcome scale.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R47",
    "title": "Gastrointestinal Interoception in Eating Disorders: Charting a New Path",
    "authors": "Khalsa SS, Berner LA, Anderson LM",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R48",
    "title": "Interoception and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a review of current evidence and future directions",
    "authors": "Bragdon LB et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R49",
    "title": "Interoception abnormalities in schizophrenia: review and integration with Bayesian accounts of psychosis",
    "authors": "Yao B, Thakkar KN",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C20",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "Alexithymia is not equivalent to poor interoception, and self-report measures can confound emotional vocabulary with bodily accuracy.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R50",
    "title": "A roadmap to understanding interoceptive awareness and post-traumatic stress disorder: a scoping review",
    "authors": "Leech K, Stapleton P, Patching A",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C22",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C45",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "Bodily self-consciousness is multisensory; interoception is one contributor among vision, touch, proprioception, vestibular signals, memory and social cognition.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R51",
    "title": "The brain-body disconnect: a somatic sensory basis for trauma-related disorders",
    "authors": "Kearney BE, Lanius RA",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C22",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C45",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "Bodily self-consciousness is multisensory; interoception is one contributor among vision, touch, proprioception, vestibular signals, memory and social cognition.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R52",
    "title": "How processing of internal and external sensory information shapes engagement with the world after trauma",
    "authors": "Harricharan S, McKinnon MC, Lanius RA",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C22",
      "BBT-C25",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C45",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "Bodily self-consciousness is multisensory; interoception is one contributor among vision, touch, proprioception, vestibular signals, memory and social cognition.",
      "No single biomarker defines stress or safety. Cortisol, HRV and inflammatory markers each index limited components of a larger response.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R53",
    "title": "Perceptual insensitivity to the modulation of interoceptive signals in depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders",
    "authors": "Smith R et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C16",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C28",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "The task-based precision parameter is not a general clinical biomarker and should not be generalized to every interoceptive channel.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Bodily arousal is not inherently pathological, and panic cannot be diagnosed from interoceptive performance or autonomic measures.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R54",
    "title": "Cardiac interoception in patients accessing secondary mental health services: a transdiagnostic study",
    "authors": "Critchley HD et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C05",
      "BBT-C16",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "No single laboratory task establishes a person’s global interoceptive ability, and self-report should not be treated as an objective physiological measure.",
      "The task-based precision parameter is not a general clinical biomarker and should not be generalized to every interoceptive channel.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R55",
    "title": "Insular dysfunction of interoception in major depressive disorder: a neuroimaging perspective",
    "authors": "Hu L et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C16",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C29",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "The task-based precision parameter is not a general clinical biomarker and should not be generalized to every interoceptive channel.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "The lecture does not claim that depression is caused by low energy, inflammation or interoceptive error; these are heterogeneous contributors and candidate mechanisms.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R56",
    "title": "Insula-cerebellar functional connectivity associated with somatic symptoms in mood disorders",
    "authors": "Hattori S et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C16",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C29",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "The task-based precision parameter is not a general clinical biomarker and should not be generalized to every interoceptive channel.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "The lecture does not claim that depression is caused by low energy, inflammation or interoceptive error; these are heterogeneous contributors and candidate mechanisms.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R57",
    "title": "Interoceptive ability is uncorrelated across respiratory and cardiac axes in a large-scale psychophysical study",
    "authors": "Banellis L et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C06",
      "BBT-C16",
      "BBT-C17",
      "BBT-C27",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Evidence for cross-modal independence is growing but task reliability remains an active methodological problem.",
      "The task-based precision parameter is not a general clinical biomarker and should not be generalized to every interoceptive channel.",
      "Clinical heterogeneity is substantial; the same symptom label can arise from different combinations of attention, precision, prior expectation and physiology.",
      "The attractor interpretation is a Flow Hijacked synthesis. Individual symptoms can persist for many reasons not captured by this loop.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R58",
    "title": "Functional neurological disorder: new subtypes and shared mechanisms",
    "authors": "Hallett M et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R59",
    "title": "Persistent physical symptoms: definition, genesis, and management",
    "authors": "Lowe B et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R60",
    "title": "Persistent Physical Symptoms as Perceptual Dysregulation: a neuropsychobehavioral model and clinical implications",
    "authors": "Henningsen P et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C30",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Transdiagnostic similarity does not erase diagnosis-specific mechanisms, developmental pathways or treatment evidence.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R61",
    "title": "Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain",
    "authors": "Ashar YK et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C31",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Interoceptive models complement rather than replace reward learning, habit, stress, social context and pharmacology in addiction.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R62",
    "title": "Shape shifting pain: chronification of back pain shifts brain representation",
    "authors": "Hashmi JA et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C31",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Interoceptive models complement rather than replace reward learning, habit, stress, social context and pharmacology in addiction.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R63",
    "title": "Reward deficiency and anti-reward in pain chronification",
    "authors": "Borsook D et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C31",
      "BBT-C32",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "Interoceptive models complement rather than replace reward learning, habit, stress, social context and pharmacology in addiction.",
      "Negative reinforcement is prominent in many addictions but does not describe every stage, substance or person.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R64",
    "title": "Beyond the symptom: the biology of fatigue",
    "authors": "Raizen DM et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C12",
      "BBT-C31",
      "BBT-C32",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "The lecture does not infer individual energy metabolism from subjective fatigue, nor does it frame fatigue as a single computational error.",
      "Interoceptive models complement rather than replace reward learning, habit, stress, social context and pharmacology in addiction.",
      "Negative reinforcement is prominent in many addictions but does not describe every stage, substance or person.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R65",
    "title": "Neurobiology of eating behavior, nutrition, and health",
    "authors": "Stover PJ et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C12",
      "BBT-C23",
      "BBT-C29",
      "BBT-C31",
      "BBT-C32",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "The lecture does not infer individual energy metabolism from subjective fatigue, nor does it frame fatigue as a single computational error.",
      "The control-theoretic language is explanatory; individual agency cannot be inferred from one physiological or computational measure.",
      "The lecture does not claim that depression is caused by low energy, inflammation or interoceptive error; these are heterogeneous contributors and candidate mechanisms.",
      "Interoceptive models complement rather than replace reward learning, habit, stress, social context and pharmacology in addiction.",
      "Negative reinforcement is prominent in many addictions but does not describe every stage, substance or person.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R66",
    "title": "Heterogeneous appetite patterns in depression: computational modeling of nutritional interoception, reward processing, and decision-making",
    "authors": "Uchida Y et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "1. Before Thought - The Body Is Already Acting",
      "4. Homeostasis Was Not Enough - Enter Allostasis",
      "8. The Body and the Self - Why I Feel Like Me",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C03",
      "BBT-C12",
      "BBT-C23",
      "BBT-C29",
      "BBT-C31",
      "BBT-C32",
      "BBT-C46",
      "BBT-C47"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "The Flow Hijacked synthesis is an integration across literatures; it is not a validated diagnostic model.",
      "The lecture does not infer individual energy metabolism from subjective fatigue, nor does it frame fatigue as a single computational error.",
      "The control-theoretic language is explanatory; individual agency cannot be inferred from one physiological or computational measure.",
      "The lecture does not claim that depression is caused by low energy, inflammation or interoceptive error; these are heterogeneous contributors and candidate mechanisms.",
      "Interoceptive models complement rather than replace reward learning, habit, stress, social context and pharmacology in addiction.",
      "Negative reinforcement is prominent in many addictions but does not describe every stage, substance or person.",
      "Interoceptive Attractor Capture is a proposed Flow Hijacked model. Attractor depth, basin geometry and precision rigidity have not been directly measured as a unified clinical construct.",
      "Policy entropy and hysteresis are formal hypotheses. They require operational definitions and longitudinal perturbation data before clinical use."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R67",
    "title": "Interoception and psychopathology: a developmental neuroscience perspective",
    "authors": "Murphy J, Brewer R, Catmur C, Bird G",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "7. Before Emotion Has a Name",
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C20",
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Alexithymia is not equivalent to poor interoception, and self-report measures can confound emotional vocabulary with bodily accuracy.",
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R68",
    "title": "Being in Tune With Your Body: the emergence of interoceptive processing through caregiver-infant feeding interactions",
    "authors": "Filippetti ML",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R69",
    "title": "The body comes first: embodied reparation and the co-creation of infant bodily-self",
    "authors": "Montirosso R, McGlone F",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R70",
    "title": "Affective regulation through touch: homeostatic and allostatic mechanisms",
    "authors": "Fotopoulou A, von Mohr M, Krahe C",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R71",
    "title": "Developmental perspectives on interpersonal affective touch",
    "authors": "Crucianelli L, Filippetti ML",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R72",
    "title": "What are C-tactile afferents and how do they relate to affective touch?",
    "authors": "Schirmer A, Croy I, Ackerley R",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C35",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Social buffering is heterogeneous and cannot be reduced to HRV, oxytocin or one attachment style.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R73",
    "title": "Keep Calm and Cuddle On: social touch as a stress buffer",
    "authors": "Morrison I",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C35",
      "BBT-C44",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Social buffering is heterogeneous and cannot be reduced to HRV, oxytocin or one attachment style.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R74",
    "title": "Interactive synchrony and infants’ vagal tone as an index of emotion regulation",
    "authors": "Puglisi N et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C35",
      "BBT-C36",
      "BBT-C44",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Social buffering is heterogeneous and cannot be reduced to HRV, oxytocin or one attachment style.",
      "Synchrony is descriptive unless experimental design identifies direction, mechanism and functional consequence.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R75",
    "title": "A Developmental Framework of Interpersonal Neural Synchrony",
    "authors": "Hoehl S et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C35",
      "BBT-C36",
      "BBT-C44",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Social buffering is heterogeneous and cannot be reduced to HRV, oxytocin or one attachment style.",
      "Synchrony is descriptive unless experimental design identifies direction, mechanism and functional consequence.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R76",
    "title": "Social Baseline Theory: the social regulation of risk and effort",
    "authors": "Coan JA, Sbarra DA",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C35",
      "BBT-C36",
      "BBT-C44",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Social buffering is heterogeneous and cannot be reduced to HRV, oxytocin or one attachment style.",
      "Synchrony is descriptive unless experimental design identifies direction, mechanism and functional consequence.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R77",
    "title": "Health neuroscience 2.0: integration with social, cognitive and affective neuroscience",
    "authors": "Inagaki TK",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "9. When Adaptation Becomes the Problem",
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C26",
      "BBT-C34",
      "BBT-C35",
      "BBT-C36",
      "BBT-C45"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Developmental effects are probabilistic, not destiny; retrospective adversity measures and causal inference have important limitations.",
      "Co-regulation should never be used to justify forced touch, dependency, surveillance or the claim that one person can directly control another’s nervous system.",
      "Social buffering is heterogeneous and cannot be reduced to HRV, oxytocin or one attachment style.",
      "Synchrony is descriptive unless experimental design identifies direction, mechanism and functional consequence.",
      "Persistent bodily consequences of trauma are real; the caution concerns literalized storage claims, not the legitimacy of embodied symptoms."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R78",
    "title": "The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis",
    "authors": "Cryan JF et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C35",
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Social buffering is heterogeneous and cannot be reduced to HRV, oxytocin or one attachment style.",
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R79",
    "title": "The Gut-Brain Axis",
    "authors": "Mayer EA, Nance K, Chen S",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C35",
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Social buffering is heterogeneous and cannot be reduced to HRV, oxytocin or one attachment style.",
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R80",
    "title": "The Vagus Nerve at the Interface of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis",
    "authors": "Bonaz B, Bazin T, Pellissier S",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "12. The Borrowed Body - Regulation Is Learned Between People",
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C35",
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Social buffering is heterogeneous and cannot be reduced to HRV, oxytocin or one attachment style.",
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R81",
    "title": "Immunoception: the insular cortex perspective",
    "authors": "Rolls A",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C07",
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Vagal anatomy does not justify using vagal tone as a synonym for safety, regulation, resilience or social engagement.",
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R82",
    "title": "The neuroimmune connectome in health and disease",
    "authors": "Wheeler MA, Quintana FJ",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C38",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Immune mechanisms explain only subsets of psychiatric symptoms; biomarkers such as CRP are nonspecific and should not be used as stand-alone psychiatric explanations.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R83",
    "title": "Neural representation of cytokines by vagal sensory neurons",
    "authors": "Huerta T et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C38",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Immune mechanisms explain only subsets of psychiatric symptoms; biomarkers such as CRP are nonspecific and should not be used as stand-alone psychiatric explanations.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R84",
    "title": "Stress-sensitive neural circuits change the gut microbiome via duodenal glands",
    "authors": "Chang H et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C38"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Immune mechanisms explain only subsets of psychiatric symptoms; biomarkers such as CRP are nonspecific and should not be used as stand-alone psychiatric explanations."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R85",
    "title": "Select microbial metabolites in the small intestinal lumen regulate vagal activity via receptor-mediated signaling",
    "authors": "Jameson KG et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C38"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Immune mechanisms explain only subsets of psychiatric symptoms; biomarkers such as CRP are nonspecific and should not be used as stand-alone psychiatric explanations."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R86",
    "title": "PIEZO2 in somatosensory neurons controls gastrointestinal transit",
    "authors": "Servin-Vences MR et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C38",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Immune mechanisms explain only subsets of psychiatric symptoms; biomarkers such as CRP are nonspecific and should not be used as stand-alone psychiatric explanations.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R87",
    "title": "Enteroendocrine cell regulation of the gut-brain axis",
    "authors": "Barton JR et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C38",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Immune mechanisms explain only subsets of psychiatric symptoms; biomarkers such as CRP are nonspecific and should not be used as stand-alone psychiatric explanations.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R88",
    "title": "Sensory spinal interoceptive pathways and energy balance regulation",
    "authors": "Munzberg H, Berthoud HR, Neuhuber W",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C07",
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Vagal anatomy does not justify using vagal tone as a synonym for safety, regulation, resilience or social engagement.",
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R89",
    "title": "Hepatic interoception in health and disease",
    "authors": "Berthoud HR et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C07",
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Vagal anatomy does not justify using vagal tone as a synonym for safety, regulation, resilience or social engagement.",
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R90",
    "title": "Psychological interventions for interoception in mental health disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials",
    "authors": "Heim N et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "13. Beyond the Nervous System - Gut, Metabolism and Immunoception"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C07",
      "BBT-C37",
      "BBT-C39"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Vagal anatomy does not justify using vagal tone as a synonym for safety, regulation, resilience or social engagement.",
      "Mechanistic animal findings require careful translation to human subjective experience and psychiatric outcomes.",
      "Microbiome associations should be separated from causal intervention evidence, and psychiatric claims require independent replication in humans."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R91",
    "title": "Interoceptive technologies for psychiatric interventions: from diagnosis to clinical applications",
    "authors": "Schoeller F et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "14. Can the Body Learn Again? - Recalibration and Treatment",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C18",
      "BBT-C40",
      "BBT-C41",
      "BBT-C42",
      "BBT-C43",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Evidence that precision change causally mediates clinical recovery is emerging and not yet sufficient for broad treatment claims.",
      "Exposure should be condition-specific and clinically guided where appropriate; deliberately provoking symptoms is not a universal self-help strategy.",
      "Mindfulness, breathwork and HRV interventions vary substantially; adverse effects and contraindications should not be erased by wellness marketing.",
      "Mechanistic target engagement, symptom benefit, durability and regulatory approval are separate questions and must be reported separately.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R92",
    "title": "Heart rate variability biofeedback: how and why does it work?",
    "authors": "Lehrer PM, Gevirtz R",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "14. Can the Body Learn Again? - Recalibration and Treatment",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C18",
      "BBT-C41",
      "BBT-C42",
      "BBT-C43",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Evidence that precision change causally mediates clinical recovery is emerging and not yet sufficient for broad treatment claims.",
      "Mindfulness, breathwork and HRV interventions vary substantially; adverse effects and contraindications should not be erased by wellness marketing.",
      "Mechanistic target engagement, symptom benefit, durability and regulatory approval are separate questions and must be reported separately.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R93",
    "title": "Real-time fMRI neurofeedback boosts heartbeat perception by modulating insula activation during interoceptive attention",
    "authors": "Haruki Y et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "14. Can the Body Learn Again? - Recalibration and Treatment",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C18",
      "BBT-C33",
      "BBT-C41",
      "BBT-C42",
      "BBT-C43",
      "BBT-C44",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Evidence that precision change causally mediates clinical recovery is emerging and not yet sufficient for broad treatment claims.",
      "Regulatory-repertoire language is a Flow Hijacked construct; it is not a validated addiction outcome scale.",
      "Mindfulness, breathwork and HRV interventions vary substantially; adverse effects and contraindications should not be erased by wellness marketing.",
      "Mechanistic target engagement, symptom benefit, durability and regulatory approval are separate questions and must be reported separately.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts.",
      "The lecture does not use polyvagal categories as established diagnostic states and does not infer felt safety directly from HRV.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R94",
    "title": "Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation modulates interoceptive prediction-error processing and allostatic regulation",
    "authors": "Ventura-Bort C, Weymar M",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "14. Can the Body Learn Again? - Recalibration and Treatment",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C07",
      "BBT-C18",
      "BBT-C33",
      "BBT-C40",
      "BBT-C41",
      "BBT-C42",
      "BBT-C43",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Vagal anatomy does not justify using vagal tone as a synonym for safety, regulation, resilience or social engagement.",
      "Evidence that precision change causally mediates clinical recovery is emerging and not yet sufficient for broad treatment claims.",
      "Regulatory-repertoire language is a Flow Hijacked construct; it is not a validated addiction outcome scale.",
      "Exposure should be condition-specific and clinically guided where appropriate; deliberately provoking symptoms is not a universal self-help strategy.",
      "Mindfulness, breathwork and HRV interventions vary substantially; adverse effects and contraindications should not be erased by wellness marketing.",
      "Mechanistic target engagement, symptom benefit, durability and regulatory approval are separate questions and must be reported separately.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R95",
    "title": "A systematic review of associations between interoception, vagal tone, and emotional regulation",
    "authors": "Pinna T, Edwards DJ",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "14. Can the Body Learn Again? - Recalibration and Treatment",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C18",
      "BBT-C33",
      "BBT-C40",
      "BBT-C41",
      "BBT-C42",
      "BBT-C43",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Evidence that precision change causally mediates clinical recovery is emerging and not yet sufficient for broad treatment claims.",
      "Regulatory-repertoire language is a Flow Hijacked construct; it is not a validated addiction outcome scale.",
      "Exposure should be condition-specific and clinically guided where appropriate; deliberately provoking symptoms is not a universal self-help strategy.",
      "Mindfulness, breathwork and HRV interventions vary substantially; adverse effects and contraindications should not be erased by wellness marketing.",
      "Mechanistic target engagement, symptom benefit, durability and regulatory approval are separate questions and must be reported separately.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R96",
    "title": "Interoception, contemplative practice, and health",
    "authors": "Farb NAS et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "11. Craving - When Regulation Becomes Compulsion",
      "14. Can the Body Learn Again? - Recalibration and Treatment",
      "15. The Nervous-System Regulation Myth",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C33",
      "BBT-C41",
      "BBT-C43",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Regulatory-repertoire language is a Flow Hijacked construct; it is not a validated addiction outcome scale.",
      "Mindfulness, breathwork and HRV interventions vary substantially; adverse effects and contraindications should not be erased by wellness marketing.",
      "There is no single physiological pattern that defines psychological regulation across people and contexts.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R97",
    "title": "From many to none: meditation and the plasticity of the predictive mind",
    "authors": "Laukkonen RE, Slagter HA",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C05",
      "BBT-C06",
      "BBT-C09",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "No single laboratory task establishes a person’s global interoceptive ability, and self-report should not be treated as an objective physiological measure.",
      "Evidence for cross-modal independence is growing but task reliability remains an active methodological problem.",
      "Cardiac, respiratory and gastric phase effects are real research domains, but effect sizes and generalizability vary across tasks.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R98",
    "title": "Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception",
    "authors": "Coll MP et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C05",
      "BBT-C06",
      "BBT-C09",
      "BBT-C18",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "No single laboratory task establishes a person’s global interoceptive ability, and self-report should not be treated as an objective physiological measure.",
      "Evidence for cross-modal independence is growing but task reliability remains an active methodological problem.",
      "Cardiac, respiratory and gastric phase effects are real research domains, but effect sizes and generalizability vary across tasks.",
      "Evidence that precision change causally mediates clinical recovery is emerging and not yet sufficient for broad treatment claims.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R99",
    "title": "The respiratory resistance sensitivity task: quantifying respiratory interoception and metacognition",
    "authors": "Nikolova N et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "10. One Body, Many Diagnoses",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C05",
      "BBT-C06",
      "BBT-C09",
      "BBT-C18",
      "BBT-C28",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "No single laboratory task establishes a person’s global interoceptive ability, and self-report should not be treated as an objective physiological measure.",
      "Evidence for cross-modal independence is growing but task reliability remains an active methodological problem.",
      "Cardiac, respiratory and gastric phase effects are real research domains, but effect sizes and generalizability vary across tasks.",
      "Evidence that precision change causally mediates clinical recovery is emerging and not yet sufficient for broad treatment claims.",
      "Bodily arousal is not inherently pathological, and panic cannot be diagnosed from interoceptive performance or autonomic measures.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  },
  {
    "id": "R100",
    "title": "The heart rate discrimination task: estimating accuracy and precision of interoceptive beliefs",
    "authors": "Legrand N et al",
    "year": null,
    "journal": null,
    "doi": null,
    "pmid": null,
    "canonical_url": null,
    "deduplicated_by": "canonical title (DOI, PMID and author/year are not supplied in either canonical PDF)",
    "bibliography_editions": [
      "en",
      "he"
    ],
    "relevant_lecture_chapters": [
      "2. The Hidden Sense - What Interoception Really Is",
      "3. How the Body Reaches the Brain",
      "6. Precision - Which Signal Deserves to Be Believed?",
      "14. Can the Body Learn Again? - Recalibration and Treatment",
      "16. Flow Hijacked Novel Concept - Interoceptive Attractor Capture"
    ],
    "claim_ids": [
      "BBT-C06",
      "BBT-C09",
      "BBT-C18",
      "BBT-C42",
      "BBT-C48"
    ],
    "evidence_strength": "See the linked claim-level evidence category and boundary",
    "limitations": [
      "Evidence for cross-modal independence is growing but task reliability remains an active methodological problem.",
      "Cardiac, respiratory and gastric phase effects are real research domains, but effect sizes and generalizability vary across tasks.",
      "Evidence that precision change causally mediates clinical recovery is emerging and not yet sufficient for broad treatment claims.",
      "Mechanistic target engagement, symptom benefit, durability and regulatory approval are separate questions and must be reported separately.",
      "The proposed measures are a research program, not established clinical endpoints. Failure to outperform simpler models should lead to revision or rejection of the concept."
    ]
  }
]
